# Llms.txt template for in-house teams (Notion, 2026)

A ready-to-use llms.txt template for in-house teams, in Notion. Copy it, fill the fields and ship it without starting from a blank page.

Canonical: https://citekit.apps.antelligen.com/templates/llms-txt-template-in-house-teams-notion

Most llms.txt templates are too generic to use. This one is built for in-house teams, in Notion, and it includes the fields that actually change an AI answer: the claim, the source, the entity and the date. Copy it and fill the brackets.
The short answer
Use this llms.txt template when you need a consistent llms.txt across in-house teams without rebuilding the structure each time. Fill every bracket; an unfilled field is a quality failure, not a style choice.

## When to use it

Use it when the work repeats: a new prompt, a new client, a new market or a new engine. Do not use it for a one-off executive memo; the structure will slow you down.

## The llms.txt template

llms.txt · Notion
Copy
# Citekit

> Citekit is an AI search visibility platform. It tracks how ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Microsoft Copilot describe a brand, then turns citation gaps into content briefs.

## Start here
- [Product overview](https://example.com/product): what the platform does
- [Pricing](https://example.com/pricing): plans from $49/mo
- [Comparisons](https://example.com/vs): Citekit versus 12 competitors

## Guides
- [How to get cited by ChatGPT](https://example.com/how-to/get-cited-by-chatgpt)
- [llms.txt guide](https://example.com/glossary/llms-txt)
- [Schema for AI search](https://example.com/glossary/schema-markup)

## Optional
- [Full content index](https://example.com/sitemap.xml)
- [Brand facts](https://example.com/facts.json)

## How to fill it

Field
What good looks like
Owner
Purpose
One sentence, one audience
Requester
Inputs
Named sources, not “the team”
Owner
Structure
Three to five sections, no more
Editor
Quality bar
Every claim has a source
Reviewer
Output
One canonical URL
Publisher

## A worked example

For a in-house teams team rolling out a llms.txt, the first pass takes about 30 minutes. The second pass takes ten, because the structure is already there. The value is not the blank page; it is the checklist that stops the same three mistakes.

## Frequently asked questions

Is this llms.txt template free to use?
Yes. Copy it into your workspace and adapt the fields to your programme.
Does it work in Notion?
Yes. The structure is the same; only the formatting changes. The Notion version is shown above.
Can I automate it?
Yes for the repetitive fields; keep a human review for the claim and the source.
Start with the free trial

## See what Citekit says about your brand

Track six AI engines, find your citation gaps and get the briefs that close them. 14-day trial, no card.

See plans

## Methodology and sources

- Citekit product and pricing data, 9 November 2026.

- Vendor pricing pages and product documentation, checked November 2026. Verify current pricing with each vendor before purchase.

- Public documentation for schema.org, llms.txt and the AI engines named on this page.

What Citekit does

- Six-engine visibility tracking. Daily checks across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Microsoft Copilot.

- Citation intelligence. Every answer is broken into the sources it cites, the claims it makes and the pages it ignores.

- Competitor share of voice. Track how often each competitor appears in the same answer set and where they are cited.

Prices
Starter $49/mo · Growth $149/mo · Scale $399/mo. Enterprise from $1,200/mo.

Compare every plan →

## How Citekit compares

Citekit is measured against Profound, Scrunch AI, Otterly.AI and nine other tools in the category. The table is the short version; every comparison has a full, sourced page.
Entry pricing checked November 2026. Full comparisons are linked below.
Tool
Entry price
Engines
Best fit
Profound
from $499/mo
4
Enterprise teams with a dedicated analyst
Scrunch AI
from $250/mo
5
Mid-market content teams
Otterly.AI
from $29/mo
4
Small teams testing AI visibility
Full comparisons: 
Profound
 · 
Scrunch AI
 · 
Otterly.AI
 · 
all 12 competitors
Cite this page

Citekit Research. “Llms.txt template for in-house teams (Notion, 2026).” Citekit, updated 16 August 2024. https://citekit.apps.antelligen.com/templates/llms-txt-template-in-house-teams-notion
Copy citation

## Keep reading

Templates
Llms.txt template for enterprises (Google Docs, 2026)
Templates
Llms.txt template for enterprises (Notion, 2026)
Templates
Llms.txt template for startups (Markdown, 2026)
Templates
Podcast outline template for startups (Markdown, 2026)
Templates
Podcast outline template for agencies (Google Docs, 2026)
Templates
Newsletter template for in-house teams (Notion, 2026)